Wednesday, 11 September 2013

6th September

In today’s lesson we looked at Steven Berkoff as a physical practitioner and did some exercises that help to develop and explore characterisation. Berkoff often works with non-naturalistic texts with grotesque and exaggerated characters.

We started off with a Jacques Lecoq exercise, where the top half of your body hangs over the legs, imagining there is a sheet of glass in front of you, you roll up pushing out the knees, hips, chest and nose so that they touch the piece of glass until you are standing straight.

Knees: We then repeated this roll down and up but stopping at the point when the knees are touching the glass. We took this stature for a walk around the room and we saw what characters were created by the physicality. I immediately created an older more hunched character as I had the top of my body still rolled over, creating a slightly weathered element to my character. This made me consider her back-story and previous life that may have been difficult or just had to work had at getting what she wanted. My character also had a lower status as she was so introverted and almost seemed to shy away form the world, this made me think of the old ladies who become so scared of leaving their homes because of the media and how the world is portrayed to them. Other people created different characters such as one person straightened their back but still lead from their knees, this created a character that was of a similar age to mine however the straightened back and having her head raised gave her character a much higher status than my characters and gave her a snobbish, looking down on people element.

Hips: Again we rolled down and when we rolled back up we stopped at the moment when the hips were touching the glass and we started to explore what types of characters were created through leading with the hips. I had my pelvis thrust out and so it felt natural to lean my to half back as much as possible. This created a very relaxed posture for my character and I had the feel that they didn’t care much about what was happening around them and this gave them a slightly higher status because they seemed unaffected by the world. I also went for a male, very “laddish” type of character as I felt he was being lead by the penis, combining this with the casual attitude coming out of the physicality I felt I created a quite popular, sexual confident chap. It was very interesting to watch the other characters that were created and the small differences in their physicality that changed the intention of their character. For example another character was also a male and being lead by his penis in a sexual manner however instead of having a relaxed, laid back upper body, he was hunched over and wringing his hands. This gave the character a much more creepy and sinister feel and implied that he had bad intentions sexually within him. Instead for going for a male character someone choose to do a female and by simply placing one hand on her belly and one on her back she created a pregnant woman.

Chest: This time when we rolled back up we stopped when the chest was touching the glass and walked this character around the room, developing and exploring their characteristics and what was created. As my chest was sticking out I created a confident, sensual female character and the breasts are quite a sexualised part of the female form. It made me do a more feminine walk, crossing my feet and wiggling my hips to highlight the other assets of a female. Also because I was very upright, as a result of my chest being pushed I felt very powerful as a character and that I had a lot of confidence and looked down on people. This power and confidence was mirrored in the male take on sticking the chest out. The character became very proud and puffed out like a cockerel demonstrating his status and his masculinity. This one was driven more by his own appearance and pride to have confidence, where as the men with their hips out were driven by the sexual wants to have confidence.   

Nose: When rolling up this time we stopped at the nose touching the glass and explored what types of characters were created when they were being lead by their nose. Again I went for an older character and hunched the rest of my body but kept my nose up in the air, as my head was up and open I was of a higher status than my character that I created with my knees. Also this character moved around a lot, twisted their head to try and smell out what was happening and what they could see. As I live in a village this character reminded me a lot of the older members of my community who like to be nosy and know everything about other peoples lives. Other characters that were created were very high status as they had their bodies kept straight and with good posture, with this as well as the nose being pointed up into the air it seemed to created a very stereotypical view of posh people. It looked as if they were looking down on everyone around them and were disgusted by people who were lower class than them.
 
This was really useful because it showed us how different types of characters can be created from the same bases of being lead by a certain part of the body and how more detailed characters can come to life by the simple things you do with the rest on the body, such as moving your hands. It also helps to see and acknowledge the stereotypes of different characters and then decide whether to follow them to present a certain group of people or to go against them to show a slightly more interesting and real character. This exercise also tied in really well with looking at Berkoff as he would use this to see where a character was lead from and how this defined a character or not and what it said about them. Also he works a lot with exaggeration and this exploration of their physicality allows an actor to connect with their bodies and to see how different characters could be exaggerated with their physicality’s to create a grotesque version of them. 
 
As I have said Berkoff works a lot with exaggeration and he uses the scale of 1 – 10, 1 being the smallest and 10 the biggest, to explore the characters exaggerated and under-exaggerated and see what affect that has on them and the situation that they are in. We did an exercise where we had to go through eating a certain meal; first we did it at 5 – naturally. I choose to be eating spaghetti bolognaise and we had to go through it a couple of times to get a set routine and then we started to play with the scale. As the scale went up the amount and size of the food got bigger and as a result our reactions to the food got bigger as well. When we were going up through the scale I saw my spaghetti getting bigger and this meant that I widened my feet so that I could encompass all of the food. I also made the movements of turning the food onto the spoon bigger and had to use two hands when I got to 10 and had to physically crouch and turn my face upwards to lower it all in. I feel that this created a much greedier character as I was really tucking into the food and it was getting more and more open and grotesque, because of this there was an off putting element to the character as they were so messy. The physicality getting larger created a more animalistic and boisterous character in the way that they ate. However when we started to go down the scale my physicality became a lot more insecure as it was very introverted and turned inwards, with my face down I felt that a more timid and shy character was created compared to the larger numbers on the scales. I felt quite suppressed and very conscious of what was happening around me and never really comfortable in what I was doing. This exercise was really interesting to see what changed when you played around with exaggeration and what types of characters are created when you push them to one extreme or another. It also really engaged my body and made me aware on my physicality and how that affected and changed characters and what was happening on the inside as well as on the outside.

We then extended this exercise with a partner and put the characters, which were created, into a situation such as a restaurant. We had the characters separate from each other and one was large on the scale with the other small, then we introduced another character who we both greeted however the greeting provoked the characters to swap positions on the scale of exaggeration. I started off being an 8 or 9 on the scale and I was really digging in and eating my food manically, as if I really enjoyed it, then when the third character came in and I greeted, I moved down to a 3 or 2 on the scale. I made this move purposeful by having an emotional attachment on the third character of fancying them and then being embarrassed of how I was caught eating and that making me shrink into myself. Where as my partner started eating in a really small way, showing insecurity and low self-confidence but when she was the third person she lit up and became more exaggerated and her motivation was of being really good friends with this person and them giving her confidence. I thought that this exercise was really useful because it showed how people and characters can be affected by others and how that can change their confidence or attitude inside them and consequently affect their outside physicalisation. It shows how important reactions are when action and how your physicality can tell a lot to an audience about how the character feels or how someone makes the character feel and it can build and explain relationships between characters.

No comments:

Post a Comment